Matteo Tinelli vs Patrick Grigoriu Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W W L L L
Form
L L L W L W L L L LHead-2-Head: Tinelli 1 - 0 Grigoriu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tinelli winning 2 and Grigoriu winning 0. The last match between Tinelli and Grigoriu was at the Romania F10, 26-07-2016, First, Clay with Matteo Tinelli getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matteo Tinelli | 1 |
| Patrick Grigoriu | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Matteo Tinelli
Player
Patrick Grigoriu
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:18:0 | Average Match Time | 1:18:0 |
| 63% (29/46) | 1st Serve % | 53% (35/66) |
| 66% (19/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (22/35) |
| 47% (8/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (8/31) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 55% (36/66) | Return Points Win % | 41% (19/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matteo Tinelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3-6 7-5 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(10) 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(6) 5-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Cuevas
Player
Matteo Tinelli
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Tinelli
Player
Santiago Maresca
69%
(
81 of
117)
1st Serve %
70%
(
86 of
122)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
52 of
86)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
49%
(
57 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
122)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Patrick Grigoriu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rodrigo Mora Clement
Player
Patrick Grigoriu
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve %
85%
(
39 of
46)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(8) 6-7(4) 10-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Davud Amirov
Player
Patrick Grigoriu
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Grigoriu
Player
Vladimir Kravec
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
14
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Loic Cloes
Player
Patrick Grigoriu
36%
(
22 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(3) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (54/44) | Win/Loss | 44% (71/89) |
| 53% (113/99) | Sets Win/Loss | 44% (157/196) |
| 51% (945/904) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1534/1617) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 12 | Aces Total | 93 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 96 | Total Double Faults | 167 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 121.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 61.91 |
| 67% (1743/2583) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1105/1867) |
| 55% (951/1743) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (683/1105) |
| 44% (369/840) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (321/762) |
| 43% (132/304) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (59/136) |
| 43% (1067/2470) | Return Points Win % | 35% (620/1754) |
| 55% (53/96) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (69/155) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 42% (5/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 23% (5/22) |
| 67% (12/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (20/36) |
| 91% (54/49) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (66/56) |
| 9% (54/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (66/10) |
| 11% (44/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (94/15) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
